Imagine you are the founder of a high-growth startup. You’ve built an amazing product, attracted an all-star team, and landed impressive early customers. Venture funding has gotten you this far, but now it’s time for a Series C or D round. This much capital likely means accepting investment from private equity firms. Is that wise?
This deep dive explores the realities – good and bad – of private equity money for founders still leading startups. Read on to make an informed decision before signing over that chunk of equity and control.
The Allure of Private Equity Dollars
Once early-stage ventures demonstrate solid product-market fit and growth, they become magnets for private equity investors. And for good reason – late stage funding unlocks fuel for accelerating expansion. With PE investment, founders gain:
- Growth Capital: Big equity checks provide the working capital to scale aggressively and capitalize on market opportunities sooner. Hundreds of millions in capital can supercharge sales, marketing, facilities, and global expansion.
- Operational Expertise: Seasoned PE partners often bring years of experience improving operations, finance, strategy, and growth at Fortune 500 companies. This know-how can help take startups to the next level.
- Industry Connections: PE firms frequently specialize in certain sectors. Those links offer access to strategic partners, channel relationships, and executive talent.
- Market Validation: Landing a top PE firm validates the startup’s potential market value and business prospects, building momentum.
- Exit Planning: PE firms areexperts in M&A and IPOs – they know how to successfully exit and maximize returns for founders and investors.
Those benefits make private equity dollars tempting. And today, flush with record amounts of dry powder, PE firms actively compete to invest in late-stage tech companies. The capital is there for the taking.
The Complications and Risks Facing Founders
Before leaping, founders must carefully weigh several key downsides to private equity:
Loss of Control
Once PE money flows in, they get board seats and a share of control. Key decisions now need PE approval. They may push for rapid growth before the model is proven, or prevent a founder-friendly exit. If things go south, PEs can oust founders.
Operational Changes
PE firms have playbooks honed at slow-moving corporations that they will push founders to adopt – even if poorly fitted for nimble startups. Burdensome forecasting processes or top-heavy org structures can bog companies down.
Focus Shifts from Product to Finance
Founders motivated by innovating and customers may clash with financially-driven PEs who obsess over metrics like EBITDA. Meetings pivot from product roadmaps to complex financial models. Long term vision suffers.
Shortened Time Horizons
PE firms aim for quick exits to hit return hurdles – typically 3 to 5 years. This forces founders to focus on fast growth, not sustainable company building. Innovation may be sidelined to generate immediate revenue.
Cost Cutting and Layoffs
PEs have a reputation for aggressive cost cutting, headcount reductions, and cash flow extraction pre-exit. Such short-term moves may undermine long term success. Founders lose flexibility managing expenses.
Deal Diligence Distractions
PE due diligence is an enormous time sink for founders, taking months. Instead of building the business, founders endlessly prepare financial models, projections, operational data, and compliance materials for investors.
Tightened Governance and Controls
PE firms install stringent financial controls, processes like budgeting and planning, and governance policies. Onerous new board meetings, shareholder consents, and deal approval processes bog founders down.
How to Evaluate PE Offers
Should founders accept or pass on PE offers? There is no one-size-fits all answer. Here are key considerations for evaluating deals:
- Analyze alignment of vision and values. Do PEs support the founder’s long term innovation roadmap?
- Scrutinize PE’s governance rights, information access, and decision authority. Limit control concessions.
- Thoroughly assess operational changes PEs will impose. Do they fit startup agility needs?
- Demand PE firm support executing the founder’s plans, not just foist their own.
- Evaluate PE deal team chemistry. Ensure the board dynamic will be collaborative.
- Review PE’s portfolio for successful exits from late-stage investments. Look for win-wins.
- Get valuations from multiple PEs to understand market pricing. But don’t take a lowball bid.
- Negotiate founder-friendly terms like ratchets to protect share value if exiting below valuation.
- Secure independent legal counsel to represent founder’s personal interests when negotiating.
- Remember, other options exist beyond PE like corporate investors, debt financing, or revenue-based funding to retain control.
The Next Chapter Starts with Eyes Wide Open
Selling part of one’s company to private equity can rocket growth, but also shifts control, focus, and culture at delicate times. Going in, founders need eyes wide open to the trade-offs. With ample diligence and astute deal making, PE money can help propel startups to greatness. But without full awareness of the implications, selling out to PEs can put founders on the road to serfdom.
Think hard before signing over that chunk of equity and control. For some founders, staying private or less dilutive financing may be wiser paths. But for others, PE fuel can make reaching escape velocity possible. Assess options carefully and tread thoughtfully when charting the next chapter of your startup’s future.
Frequently Asked Questions About Private Equity Investment for Founders
- What is private equity and how does it differ from venture capital?
Private equity (PE) firms invest in established private companies to help them grow, while venture capital (VC) typically targets early stage startups. PE focuses more on operational changes while VC emphasizes advising.
- What private equity investment stages are there?
Main PE stages are late-stage venture targeting startups needing growth capital, buyouts of majority stakes in profitable companies, and distressed investing in turnarounds.
- What returns do private equity investors aim for?
PE firms want annualized returns of around 20-25% over the 3-5 year holding period. This requires exiting at high valuations relative to what they paid.
- How much equity and control do private equity firms want?
PEs may seek 20-40% ownership via preferred shares with extra rights. They get 1-2 board seats and vote on major decisions like budgets, exec hires, exit events.
- How long is the timeline for a private equity investment to exit?
PE firms want to exit in 3-5 years via acquisition or IPO to hit target returns. This pressures founders to focus on rapid, profitable growth for a quick exit.
- What operational changes do private equity firms typically make?
Common moves include hiring specialized executives, adding rigorous forecasting processes, cutting costs aggressively, and instilling financial discipline.
- What governance and reporting requirements come with accepting private equity?
PEs add legal and compliance obligations like board meetings, shareholder consents, implementation of controls like cybersecurity audits, and regular detailed financial reporting.
- How does a private equity firm assist with growth strategy?
PEs analyze markets, identify opportunities, help with sales process optimization, build partnerships, facilitate acquisitions, and plan market expansion.
- What does private equity due diligence involve for founders?
An intensive 4-8 week process of answering questions, providing documents, building models, making management presentations, and negotiating terms. It diverts founders from operations.
- What are the pros and cons of private equity vs an IPO exit for founders?
PEs allow founders to retain more control post-exit. But IPOs build public brand visibility. PEs return more cash to founders upfront. IPOs create public stock upside.
- How can founders maintain control when bringing on later stage private equity?
Negotiate limits to board seats, voting rights, decision authority, and protective clauses. Founders may also rollover more equity at exit to retain control.
- How can founders ensure alignment with a private equity firm’s goals and culture?
Through extensive reference calls, assessing past exits, ensuring the deal team has startup experience, and mutual vetting during the fundraising process. Cultural mismatch is a top reason for poor outcomes.
- What mechanisms protect founder share value if a PE forced exit occurs at an undesirable valuation?
Founder-friendly terms like ratchets automatically allocate founders extra shares if sold below acceptable valuation thresholds.
- How does a private equity firm help with capital strategy?
PEs optimize capital structure with moves like leveraging debt, mezzanine financing, recapitalizations, and growth equity. They maximize funding sources strategically.
- What attributes do private equity firms look for most in late stage startup investments?
Rapid growth and scaling metrics, large market opportunity, competitive advantage and defensibility, experienced team, and robust financial profile.
- How intensive is the private equity fundraising process for founders?
Extremely intensive. They must demonstrate business traction, financial diligence, and operational excellence to multiple PEs through presentations, data rooms, management meetings, and extensive Q&A.
- What role does an investment banker play in a PE deal?
Investment bankers help value companies, identify best PE partners, run structured processes to create competition, and negotiate optimal deal terms. They represent founders.
- What risks come with accepting private equity for founders and employees?
Risks include reduced autonomy, short-term focus jeopardizing the business, job cuts, and strained company culture. Ceding control to the wrong PE can destroy years of hard work.
- How does company valuation differ between private equity and venture capital deals?
Later stage PE firms focus more on current revenue, customers, and cash flows. This often results in lower valuations than early VC rounds. But fast-growing startups can still demand premium multiples.
- Do private equity firms only take controlling stakes in companies?
No. PEs make minority growth investments too. They may own 10-40% while founders retain control. But board seats and voting rights still allow significant PE influence.
- Can founders work with private equity but still remain private?
Yes. PE provides late stage funding while delaying IPO. Remaining private avoids public company hassles but requires eventual exit via acquisition.
- What financial information do private equity firms require during fundraising?
Detailed current and projected financial statements, P&Ls, ratios, info on costs, profits, burn rates, revenue retention, drivers and variance analysis. Operations data too.
- Should founders hire an experienced CFO before seeking private equity investment?
Yes. A CFO experienced with PE ensures you demonstrate traction in the metrics PEs care about. They also optimize deal terms and valuation.
- How can founders evaluate different private equity offers?
By comparing proposed valuations, ownership percent sold, board control rights, growth strategy input, portfolio value-add, and team cultural fit.
- What tactics help founders keep existing investors happy about ceding control to private equity?
Performance milestones that trigger PE investment, carve-outs of decision authority, and incentives for continued involvement even at lower stakes.
- Why would a founder restrict secondary share sales as a condition of accepting private equity?
To prevent early investors or executives from cashing out shares too early before full value is built. PEs want existing stakeholders retained and motivated.
- Are there good alternatives to private equity for startups needing late stage capital?
Yes. Corporate strategic investors, debt financing, revenue-based financing, and equity crowdfunding allow founders to stay private and retain control.
- How does a private equity sponsor turning over impact startups?
Successor sponsors may change strategy, force exits earlier than ideal timing, or replace founders. Lack of continuity disrupts relationships and focus as new firms impose different priorities.
- Do private equity investors only care about fast financial returns over building long-term value?
Some do. But many PEs aim to build sustainable companies too. Founders should assess alignment of philosophy on short-term gains vs. long-term aspirations.
- How do founders sell employees on the benefits of private equity ownership?
Position it as validating company success and fueling further growth. Share exit upside. Highlight opportunities to learn fromPE’s operational expertise.
- Should founders accept capital from multiple private equity firms to reduce sole dependence?
Potentially. However, minimally viable number of large PEs for efficiency. Too many creates complexity.
- How can founders and private equity investors align incentives?
Earn-outs, shares tied to growth metrics, investing personally alongside the firm, and rolling over equity provide incentives.
- Do private equity firms allow founders to maintain their internal culture and values?
Culture misalignment is a huge friction point. Assess compatibility early. Ensure alignment on people strategy and change processes in diligence. Embed cultural principles in deal terms.
- How does private equity ownership impact employees’ liquidity options?
PE preference stacks delay common liquidity events like secondary sales. But eventual exit gives employees some liquidity. Smaller exits can permit employee sales pre-IPO if negotiated.
- What protections do founders have if they are fired after accepting private equity funding?
Good counsel negotiates safety nets like large severance guarantees, retention of salary and benefits, accelerated vesting, independent board seats not controlled by PEs, and special voting rights.
- Can private equity firms force founders to exit against their will? What protections exist?
PEs can’t force but can make life difficult if interests diverge. Independent director seats, limits on voting rights, and contractual exit timing restrictions protect founders’ ability to exit on their timeline.
- How does private equity participation impact employee talent retention and startup culture?
Depends heavily on alignment with executives. Cost-cutting and short-term focus can increase attrition. But growth opportunities and liquidity prospects also motivate & retain employees.
- What can private equity firms do to win over skeptical startup founders?
Take smaller ownership stakes, accept board observer role instead of director, embed cultural principles in agreements, provide references demonstrating win-wins with founders, and offer operational value-adds not just capital.
- What protections exist if a private equity investor pressures for growth ahead of validated product-market fit?
Milestone-based capital infusion to ensure evidence first. Independent directors must approve large investments or pivots. Contractually defined growth guardrails.
- How does involving private equity impact startups competing against highly disruptive companies not focused on near-term profit?
Disrupters often avoid PE for this reason. But some hybrid strategies maintain growth investments while harvesting other assets. Take less PE capital to preserve autonomy.
- What financial governance does private equity insist on for portfolio startups?
Monthly or quarterly reviews of budgets, performance vs projections, cash flow, and KPIs. Approval for large expenditures. Audits. Success metrics tied to distributions. Oversight of fund allocation across units.
- Should startup founders have their own lawyers in private equity negotiations rather than using the company lawyers?
Yes. Personal counsel ensures protections for founders against firing, preferred liquidation terms, control concessions, cultural overrides, and decision authority. Provides confidential guidance untainted by company counsel’s biases.
- How can founders evaluate whether a private equity firm takes too much control in deal terms?
Independent counsel reviews voting rights, protective clauses, board composition, decision veto authority, and conflict resolution mechanisms for appropriate checks and balances.
- What leverage do startup founders have in private equity negotiations?
Proven growth metrics, competing PE offers that create scarcity value, willingness to walk away, and aligned existing investors willing to fund more without PE if necessary.
- What concerns may startup founders have about working with private equity investors?
Loss of autonomy, operating model misalignment, short-term actions jeopardizing long-term vision, difficult governance, exited employees due to cost-cutting, and investor-CEO philosophies conflicting.
- Should startup CEOs try to remain on the board of directors after private equity investment?
Often wise if goal is to retain influence over strategy and build long-term value. But risks being outvoted by PE allies. Sometimes stepping back allows focus on executing without power struggles.
- What concessions might private equity firms make to close deals with wary startup founders?
Minimum 3 year commitment not to force sale. Limiting board seats or observer role only. Carve outs from veto rights over certain decisions. Requiring independent director approval for major changes. Lockup period prohibiting ousting CEO.
- What protections exist for startup founders related to private equity cost cutting, budget oversight, and cash flow extraction?
Negotiate guardrails around cost cutting as percent of budget. Lock up restrictions on dividends over certain amounts. Require excess cash be reinvested in growth. Cap management fees taken.
- How can founders and private equity investors forge an effective working relationship?
Alignment on vision and mutual trust required. Set expectations upfront. Maintain consistent communication. Celebrate shared wins, even small ones. Admit mistakes quickly. Institute structured conflict resolution processes.
- How can founders carefully evaluate alignment with private equity values and leadership style?
Get references from other portfolio CEOs on their interactions. Ensure mutual understanding of motivations. Ask probing questions about failures. Review investment memos. Discuss past exits.
- What concerns may startup employees have about a private equity investment?
Faster pace requiring long hours. Pressure to boost profits. Potential layoffs and cost cuts. More rigorous performance management. Overstandardization of creative processes. Lack of transparency.
- What is the difference between a private equity investor’s deal team vs operating team?
Deal team negotiates the investment. Operating team implements changes after the deal closes. Get references on both. Continuity between teams enables smoother transitions.
- What alternatives should startup founders consider before accepting private equity investment?
Bootstrapping, corporate investors, commercial debt, revenue-based financing, hybrid models, and crowdfunding. Enables staying private and controlling destiny.
Here are more frequently asked questions about private equity investment for startup founders:
- What tactics help private equity firms win over wary startup founders during the fundraising process?
Patience building trust and not forcing changes too fast. Emphasizing value-add not just capital. Accepting feedback to modify standard approaches that don’t fit startups. Acting as partners, not masters.
- Should founders cap the overall ownership percentage acquired by private equity firms?
Yes, limit total PE ownership, ideally to 25-40%, to ensure founders retain control over voting and board seats.
- What leverage does accepting a private equity term sheet provide even before closing the deal?
Term sheets, even if non-binding, signal validation and momentum helpful for hiring, sales, partnerships, and obtaining bridge financing ahead of the close.
- Can private equity firms help startups improve their procurement and supply chain cost management?
Yes, PE operating partners often bring years of experience negotiating with vendors and optimizing procurement costs to increase margins.
- What can founders who regret accepting private equity funding do to stay motivated?
Focus energy on elements they still control like product, team, and customers. View PE oversight as freedom from fundraising distractions if harnessed correctly.
- How does financial reporting change after private equity investment?
Much greater rigor, detail, and frequency on P&L, ratios, drivers, variance analysis, forecast vs actuals, and segment performance. Quarterly or even monthly board reviews.
- Should startup founders hire chief revenue officers or other C-suite roles at the request of private equity backers?
Not necessarily. Consider the trade-offs and ensure executives fit culture first. PEs propose hires from limited perspectives. Founders understand contextual needs best.
- What protections can startup founders seek when negotiating against sophisticated private equity firms?
Experienced M&A and PE counsel. Referrals to founders who successfully negotiated win-win deals. Pre-agreed limits on concessions. Independent director allies. Competition via multiple PE terms.
- Do private equity firms allow founders to still craft an innovative culture and talent brand?
The best firms do by respecting a startup’s identity. But mismatched PEs can undermine energizing cultures with bureaucracy and cost-cutting zeal. Assess compatibility carefully.
- Can private equity investors force a sale of the startup even if founders want to remain private or take the company public?
PEs can’t literally force a sale but can make life difficult by constraining funding and growth plans. Independent director seats and voting control limits prevent unwanted exits.
- Do private equity firms help startups cultivate positive media coverage and strategic communications?
PE firms often have in-house PR teams experienced in shaping brands and strategic narratives. They can help startups communicate growth milestones and executive thought leadership.
- What mechanisms promote constructive conflict resolution between startup founders and private equity board members?
Outside mediator inclusion. De-escalation clauses. Defined process for airing disagreements productively. Planned informal relationship building activities. And aligned goals provide incentive to collaborate.
- How can founders evaluate the team culture of a private equity firm they are considering partnering with?
Talk to CEOs at multiple levels from current and past portfolio companies. Review employee satisfaction data if available. Discuss how past conflicts were resolved.
- If private equity fund performance lags, how does that impact their portfolio startups?
Pressure to cut costs, force near-term exits, and extract cash through dividends increases. But some firms stay patient if aligned with founders’ growth orientation. Still, uncertainty rises.
- What positive signals demonstrate a private equity firm respects startup founders’ leadership role?
Limiting ownership to a minority stake. Accepting observer board role only. Providing references showing past win-wins with founders. Talking about partnership not control.
- Can startups accept funding from both private equity and venture capital investors?
Yes. PE provides growth-stage capital while VC funds earlier stages. Some friction can arise around board control, future financing, and exit timing if perspectives diverge.
- What protections should founders seek if private equity backs their startup’s acquisition of other companies?
Conditions requiring PE approval for large deals. Veto rights on certain strategic combinations carrying too much risk. Pre-agreed budget limits on acquisition spending. Milestone-based capital infusion.
- What incentives motivate private equity firms to help startups beyond just a profitable exit?
Carried interest that depends on long-term fund performance incentivizes building sustainable companies. Confidence of limited partners in governance capabilities. Desire to enhance reputational brand.
- How can founders maintain corporate social responsibility principles after private equity investment?
Embed into deal terms. Secure independent board seats not controlled by PE. Build employee, customer, and public good will through actions. Institute governance and reporting requirements.
- What concerns may employees have about leadership changes driven by later stage private equity investors?
Loss of startup culture. Past leaders disempowered. Short-term thinking jeopardizing products and mission. Instability if PE later forces exit before realizing strategy.
- Should startups implement new systems and processes before or after finalizing private equity investment?
Before if possible. Demonstrating operational maturity upfront maximizes leverage negotiating the deal. But changes shouldn’t distract from diligence and deal process itself.
- What creative pricing and deal structures enable startups to optimize private equity terms?
Milestone-based financing. Liquidation preferences tied to growth metrics. Warrants providing discounted future financing. Shared liquidity at exit. Founder ratchets for undersized exit value.
- How can startups evaluate whether a PE sponsor would make a controlling rather than minority investment?
Assess by ownership percentage sought, number of board seats requested, breadth of veto rights over operating decisions, and whether they mandate certain growth initiatives or leadership changes.
- How can founders evaluate whether a private equity firm prizes loyalty in leadership?
Reference check tenure of startup founders remaining post-investment. Review how PE talks about past exits and founder relationships. Discuss philosophies around change.
- What mechanisms align private equity sponsors with founders’ long-term focus beyond chasing quick exits?
Earn-outs over 3-5 years post-exit. Rollover equity. Contractual limits preventing forced exits before milestones met. Carried interest for funds dependent on sustained value creation.
- How can startups tactfully negotiate down the hefty fees private equity firms charge portfolio companies?
Compare to precedents. Link fees to value creation milestones. Require fee transparency in annual budgets. Cap total fees annually or over fund lifetime.
- What innovative private equity deal structures enable startups to optimize alignment?
Milestone-based investment. Debt-like preferred shares instead of traditional equity. Warrants for future discounted financing. Liquidation preferences indexed to growth. Founder ratchets.
- Are dual-class share structures used to preserve voting control acceptable to private equity investors?
Some, but not all. Multi-class structures limit PEs’ ability to take over via common shares. Accepting limited voting rights demonstrates founder loyalty commitment.
- What steps help startups select the optimal private equity partners from competing investment offers?
Develop selection criteria covering ownership, governance, growth strategy, value-add capabilities, culture, team dynamics, and exit track record. Interview firms’ limited partners. Hire banker to run process.
- Can startups negotiate carve-outs from otherwise broad decision vetoes and voting rights held by private equity board members?
Yes. Pre-agree areas where PE votes don’t apply, like technology architecture or product direction. Require independent director approval for major strategic changes.
- What concerns may private equity sponsors have when founders rollover significant equity at exit to retain control of their startups?
Reduced cash payout if founders forgo liquidity to fund rollover. Continued influence preventing complete exit. Management incentives divided between new owners’ goals and founders’ legacy.
- How can startup founders evaluate the individual dealmakers at prospective private equity partners?
Reference calls. Review deal history, longevity, and compensation. Discuss how past deals negotiated. Look for experience with venture-backed startups specifically. Cultural interview.
- Who should have the deciding vote if the startup’s board splits between founder and private equity members?
Tie breaking vote from neutral independent director both approve prevents deadlock. Or requirement of supermajority including member from each side.
- Why do private equity investors sometimes request restrictions on liquidity events for existing shareholders after they invest?
To prevent critical startup investors or leaders from cashing out early before full potential is reached. Ensure existing stakeholders are retained and incentivized alongside the PE firm.
- How can startups that accepted private equity financing smoothly transition to a public listing later?
Plan well in advance. Add independent directors early. Accelerate compliance initiatives. Institute quarterly forecasting cycles expected for public companies. Hire CFO or auditing firm experienced with IPO preparation.
- What protections exist if a startup founder is fired without cause after private equity investment?
Severance guarantee or parachute. Accelerated vesting of equity. Extended exercise period for stock options. Contractual voting rights for board seats not controlled by PE. Restrictions on terminating without independent director approval.
- How can startups and private equity investors productively move past disagreements that arise after the deal closes?
Informal relationship building. Agreeing on third-party mediator. Reminding each other of shared interests in long-term success. Adhering to pre-agreed conflict resolution process. Leadership diplomacy.
- What alternatives should startups consider if uncomfortable with the typical 3-5 year investment horizons of private equity firms?
Corporate strategic investors often have longer-term focus. Sovereign wealth funds. Delaying fundraising until profitable and banking to fund growth. Mezzanine debt. Revenue-based financing.
- What concerns may private equity firms have about founders whose identities are closely tied to their startups?
Difficulty separating founders’ personal goals from company interests. Resistance to change or relinquishing control to optimize growth. Obstacles for talent management and succession planning.
- How can startups that accepted private equity navigate technological disruption by nimble competitors unencumbered by PE?
Ring-fence discretionary funds for founder control only. Seek board approval for exceptions from quarterly forecasting to enable big bets. Build strategic plans recognizing external pace of change.
- What innovative approaches help private equity firms provide non-dilutive growth funding to portfolio startups?
Structured debt products. Venture loans secured by equity value. Flexible lines of credit. Milestone-based lending. Revenue share agreements. Royalty financing.
- How should startups responf if private equity investors pressure for unsustainably rapid expansion or unreasonable cost cuts?
Frame concerns constructively in context of mutual goals. Propose alternatives with better balance of risk and reward. Seek independent director support if needed. Use mediation provisions.
- What ethical considerations should startup founders evaluate when seeking private equity funding?
Purpose-driven mission at odds with PE profit motives. Responsibility to vulnerable employees or customers. Product misuse risks. Founder values not sharing economic-centric worldview.
- How can startups avoid private equity investors forcing recapitalizations later to benefit short-term IRR?
Limits on dividends. Preferred liquidation tied to milestones. Independent directors must approve distributions. Require proceeds be used for growth investments first.
- What protections exist if a private equity firm pressures for rapid international expansion despite high risks?
Staged capital infusion tied to proof points. Limit PE voting rights on large strategic moves. Independent directors must approve initiatives beyond core plan. Founder veto rights.
- When should startup founders step back from day-to-day management after private equity investment?
When no longer the best person for the role. When unable to build alignment with PE due to fundamental conflicts. When growth requires skills beyond founder’s core strengths.
Disclosure: Some of the links to products on this blog are affiliate links (paid link). It simply means, at no additional cost to you, I’ll earn a commission if you click through and buy any product.